Ram Implosion Wing Data

I have already conducted these test and more.

Independent Test Results

To date there have been 6 independent test runs comprising two of my vortex enhancement device 1) RIW & 2) Axial Flow Vortex Chamber. Also several independent researchers are replicating the Ram-Implo-Wing, which we are currently waiting for their test results.

As you know the RIW is an externally mounted device that utilizes wing tip vortices to pull forward on the vehicle, in fact it reorients parasitic drag into a beneficial work force that translates into extended miles per gallon, it is in-deed an overunity device as well as a major building block for these types of concepts.

The RIW was first tested in 2001 as a spoiler version mounted on the back of a Chevy pickup, testing reviled the wing converted vortex displacement into a 25% fuel savings during preliminary testing.

The test vehicle was driven on a round trip consisting of 26 miles, 13 miles each way at 65 MPH. We discovered upon refueling the tank, which should have required 2 gallons of gas for the 21 mile per gallon vehicle only required 1.5 gallons to refuel the tank.

Ruffus Banks, test pilot

Toady's test drive of the RIW, a Vortex Generating System 8-15-2002... Aattached to a 1994 Chevy S-10 Extended Cab 4.3 Liter V-6 Average gas mileage before the test was 18-MPG. I drove a 100 hundred/.5 tenths-mile distance averaging speeds of 70 MPH. The vehicle consumed 2.942 Gal. @ $1.399/Gal. of gas per the 100 mile trip with the Vortex Gen. System (RIW). The odometer reading before the test read 162687.2 and after the test it read 162787.4

18-mpg w/out the RIW 34.16-MPG w/RIW

Mark McDaniel, test pilot

Sometime around the end of 2002 after testing my van’s mileage, I mounted the RIW to my vehicle an 1989 Ford van conversion LBS.—5750. Under normal driving conditions at 65-mph yielded a whapping 10-mpg...Conversely with the RIW the van has consistently yielded 27-mpg, i.e. on a single gallon of gas metered into a separate tank.

Robert A. Patterson, test pilot

I built a new smaller prototype of the XP3-S(RIW) and installed it on the "Meals On Wheels" vehicle today, Aug. 13-th 2003 8:am. A Dodge Caravan with a V-6 motor weighing in at GVW 2726 lb.. The driver weighs in at 295 lb. and I am 195 lb.. After topping off the tank we drove out 10.1 miles and back the same 10.1 miles for a total of 20.2 miles round trip, at 65-mph with the ac unit on. When we arrived back at the fueling station we were amazed to find that we could only squeeze .2 tenths of a gallon back into the tank, we even picked the hose up and tried to pour the extra gas from the line into the tank but it all ran back out onto the ground.

20.2 miles @ 0.2 tents of a gallon = 101-mpg!

Bruce Parnell, test pilot

Note: To date no attempts have been made toward reproducing this particular experiment, thus it remains a singular event. However my consciences is that in order to maintain such high mileage's the RIW will require computer automation to adjust pitch angle and height of the wing on the fly.

Speculation was offered that the fuel in the tank might have expanded thus resulting in the anomalous readings. That being the case then shouldn't every car on the planet be achieving super anomalous fuel readings?

2) The Axial Flow Vortex Chamber (AFVC) has been tested by myself and two other vehicles and local business owners, who after 30-days of testing the (AFVC) claimed to achieve "no" noticeable improvements in their vehicle's gas mileage. However when I went to retrieve the (AFVC) devices I was approached by the two men Rip Lance and Denis Harpp and was offered $200,thousand in cash as venture start-up capital if I would attach their names to my patent application as co-authors of the application.

Their words "Just so no-one can cut the other guy out of the deal"

Ironically, when I tested the (AFVC) device on my own vehicle I obtained a 4-5-mpg improvement.

Meanwhile I submitted my patent application (Nov. 24, 2003) and went public (Jan 18, 2004) on Yahoo!

btw I spent all day yesterday 5-15-2004 completing the automation of the RIW, i.e. except for the electrical wiring. I even took the wing out for a test run, {without any adjustments} and I got 19.7-mpg nearly 2X normal. The beauty of this is that with this new set-up I was able to clear out all the old frame work that was blocking a lot of air flow, so I'm in hopes of some major mpg improvements. In either case I won’t have to climb a ladder to adjust the wing anymore.

Note Eric did not post this on his site.

Hi Eric,

My name is Dan MacBolen of MacBolen Hypertech. I've been working with Space Energy Access Systems of Afton Virginia as a Consultant on SEAS PROJECT #7, and as I was experimenting with my design, I noticed that the fibbonacci sequence tends to repeat over and again within my design. When I received an email from Gary Voss of TAP-TEN Research about a guy named Robert Arlen Patterson and his unusual wing design, Gary asked if I would want to use my prime mover in a design like his... I looked at the wing and red flags went up immediately...

I had to meet this guy. Gary called him and then we conferenced via telephone 30 minutes later. I promised to go see Robert as soon as physically possible... I did! I spent approximately a week with Robert and he blew my mind. He offered to allow me to prove his concept using his third prototype wing on my 1986 Chevy Suburban 4X4 Truck... We installed it on the luggage rack via plywood square, using u-bolts and wing-nuts.

This vehicle gets about 9.5 miles per gallon with only one of the two air conditioners running on economy. Our first test run was 60 miles or so and I was pleasantly surprised to have gotten 22.4 miles to the gallon. Shocked as I was (until I began to understand the vortex mechanics) I took the wing with me and between he and I, we have made many tests together, then I left and began testing within the concept parameters. With three slight modifications to the wing and repair to bring the vehicle back to stock configuration and a "TornadoAir.com" vortex part from the local auto store, I had an increase to 26.93 miles to the gallon over a 140.7 mile trip back to Tulsa Oklahoma (from Wapanucka OK where Robert lives) when I returned home this past Sunday.

What really sent me reeling over the top was his translation of these DOGU Figurines... This really impressed me, when I began to see modern electronic symbols on a 6,000-year-old ceramic figurine. When I finally understood how this machine works especially the prime mover, I freaked out...This DOGU Figurine is actually a blueprint complete with diagrams and schematics. Robert is probably the only guy who understands these figurines and the ancient advanced technology they reveal...

He really has made the find of the millennium... This particular figure explains, using modern electronic symbols, the use of vortex mechanics in creating micro-singularities for space travel. Who ever left these figurines even has a sense of humor...if you look at a certain portion of the symbols at the end of the message, you can see a smiling face (a non-verbal "EUREKA" kind of expression as if they were relating a "CONGRATS, YOU FINALLY GOT IT!!!"

With my understanding of the "Dirac Sea", I must admit that Patterson has uncovered the find of the century or even the millennium... Now I must admit, that "dumb-ing-down" this technology for use on an infernal combustion engine vehicle or to "FIX" the automotive industry's 180 degree phase "boo-boo"(Small end first, Big end last" mistake), is very unfitting for this highly advanced technology, but hell, to prevent "FUTURE-SHOCK", not to mention educating a primitive society such as ours, I must agree that it is a very good place to begin...

Well, I continue to make modifications to my vehicle according to Robert's assistance. I may even increase my mileage to far beyond these latest improvements. You may want to give him a call and discuss his concept, especially since he holds the patent on it.

Sincerely,

Daniel Brad MacBolen III, Instructor
Ground Zero International, Combat Weapons Training Center
918-402-5178
Tulsa Oklahoma 74132

MacBolen Hypertech
Council, Idaho 83612

p.s. I'll be in Tulsa until the Conference in Salt Lake City, In July of this year...

Btw Dan called this afternoon and stated he usually spends $600-dollars to drive between Idaho where he lives and Tulsa Oklahoma, but that the trip only cost him $208-bucks using the Ram-Implo-Wing.

Let me guess JD=Jerry Decker