|
| |
Lutec 1000
Claims generator that will produce up to 1000 watts of
DC electricity twenty four hours a day, every day, which will be stored in a
battery bank and then inverted to AC power and connected directly into the
home or business.
 
Page Contents:
Official Website • Independent
Coverage • Negative
Results Reports • Intellectual
Ownership Controversy • See also
• Contact
See also: Lutec
- publicly editable directory at PESWiki
This index is not officially
associated with Lutec 1000 and is for coverage purposes only. All
substantial reports for or against will be considered for posting.
Updates
- Lutec
Demo Video Alleges Over Unity - Video shows 4.25 Watts
rectified DC going into the spinning device, which meanwhile is
producing 15.4 Watts AC, for an efficiency of 362%. (PESN;
Sept. 10, 2005)
|
 |
-
Lutec
1000 Evades Holy Grail - Progress report on the Australian company
that has claimed for years to have a commercially ready free energy device.
(PESN; June 24, 2005)
- Nov.
19, 2003 - first update since March. "Final design,
construction, testing and satisfying regulatory authorities could take
one to two years. Everything hinges on our completing the prototype to
the degree required, after which things will move very quickly."
|
|
- Lutec.com.au -
home page "The first free energy machine to be developed to
commercial stage anywhere in the world."
- Updates
- expecting unit to be on display in next couple of months or so;
patents allowed in USA & Singapore; negotiations underway with U.S.
company for global rights. (Mar 4, 2003)
- How it
Works - permanent magnets ...
- Skeptics
- Patents
- FAQ
- Opportunities
- Wanted: Electricians from all over Australia!
- Pictures
Thanks to Google
Engineers Reporting Negative Results:
Rosenthal and Cole • Ian Bryce
Report by Sterling D. Allan
March 8, 2003
Engineers, Walt
Rosenthal and Parke Cole were invited to measure the Lutec1000 in January
2001. Their measurements showed results showed 28% efficiency. The
exchange was amendable, despite the negative test results. Rosenthal
stated, "I walked them through the calculations carefully so they would
understand, but they didn't want to believe the results." Test
entailed a dynamometer measuring output the motor, powering with power supply
from wall producing DC volts, optical shaft encoder on end of shaft to measure
rpm. Results showed 50 Watts power going in and 14 Watts equivalent of
mechanical power coming out.
After receiving the above synopsis, Walt Rosenthal added the following:
|
Report by Walt Rosenthal
(recorded March 8, 2003)
The inventors would start with fully charged batteries for the
demonstration. They assumed that the battery terminal voltage would
decrease linearly as the battery was used. So, after using the battery
for, say, 30 minutes, they would again measure the battery terminal
voltage, and subtract this value from the start voltage, then multiply
that difference voltage times the known amp-hour capacity of the battery
bank, to come up with their assumption of the total energy consumed from
the battery bank. Unfortunately, battery terminal voltage is almost flat
for perhaps 90 percent of the battery capacity, before it drops off
rather steeply for the last 10 percent of it's capacity. Parke Cole and
I tried to explain this to the inventors. I am not sure we succeeded. We
were about the 15th group of people to show up on their door step after
they went public. We were the first people to bring our own test
equipment. The inventors said that the first people to show up were the
Russian Mafia. Our bottom line was 50 watts of DC power input, which
resulted in 14 watts of rotary mechanical power output. I hope the
inventors have improved their device from where we tested it so that it
now matches their statements of it's performance. |
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Energy Wise 1000 mentioned at GreaterThings.com
Sterling: The pictures of the Lutec 1000 show that the inventors have
added a second unit apparently driven by the motor and in line with the motor
since Parke and I tested it.
[...]
Walt
Feedback
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [FE-OU-FraudVictims] Lutek 1000 only 28% efficient
according to Rosenthal, 2001 independent measurement
Thanks for that update. It seems
evident that although electro-magnets require energy input to
"turn on", permanent magnets require energy input to "turn
off"! The example given on their Website - the permanent magnet and
electro-magnet supporting a weight from a steel beam - should
demonstrate this principle. i.e., Energy must be inputted to the
electro-magnet in order to overcome the weight. Although no external
energy is required for the permanent magnet to support the weight, energy
must be supplied to OVERCOME the magnet and cause the weight to
fall...thereby producing useful energy. In other words, the
permanent magnet is producing zero energy while supporting the
weight.
Regards,
Feedback
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: Lutek 1000 only 28% efficient according to Rosenthal,
2001 independent measurement
Hi Sterling I believe the measurements were taken before
they had it perfected. there was also a question of their meter. Ask
John and Lou for comments. Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: ***
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:51 AM
Subject: lutec 1000
[...] Could you please do a feature on the Lutec 1000 found at
Lutec.com there is nothing about it in the nuenergy search archive
its probably another false hope, and the Adam's motor people are
claiming the Lutec is stolen from them. With this claim and
international patents protecting this seemingly soon to be
produced generator which has swindled no investors . . . . could
this be the real thing?...
|
(This index page you are now at came as a
result of the above inquiry.) |
Claim that Lutec 1000 was Lifted from Adams
July 17, 2002 Report by Alternative Energy Institute:
http://www.altenergy.org/news/newsletter79/copy79/copy79.html
*******************************************
ADAM'S INVENTION POACHED DOWN UNDER
*******************************************
According to a recent article published by an Australian newspaper, two
Australian inventors have developed the world's "first commercial machine
which can power a house from a clean, green virtually free energy
source." The story has been posted on the Aethmogen Technologies: New
Energy Scientists website "for those interested in the subject of reverse
engineering, plagiarism, and stolen intellectual and other property." In
response to the anticipated production of the "Lutec 1000
Motor/Generator," noted Australian inventor Dr. Robert Adams reports
background details to enforce his argument that this magnetic motor cannot be
patented. Adam's writes, "This invention, which is mine, was granted a
British Patent in 1996 along with Dr. Harold Aspden of the United Kingdom
(IBM's Patent Director for 19 years), was placed in the public domain by
international publication in Nexus Magazine and according to International
Patent law, thenceforth becomes unpatentable!" Learn
more about this unfolding drama from Down Under.
Page created by Sterling
D. Allan March 8, 2003
Last updated March 12, 2013
| |
|
