| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Howard Johnson Blueprints Published by Douglass MannIt's time to share this with the world. Page Contents
Doug's CorrespondenceFirst Letter from Doug
Sterling,
Soon I will have the blueprints put on a CD, then I
will get them to you. I need to know what format you would like for me to use ( CamCad or
?) ?The plans are shop plans 2feet by 3feet pages, so I can not just scan them at home. I
will also add a copy of all the information that I have ,that I have on
paper. It may take me a week or so because, part of the blueprints, are at a shop ,that is
making a part of a motor. Have you seen Stephen Walkers running HJ Motor? I would like plans
for his micro motor? I have asked Tom Bearden to see if the plans that I have are
real H Johnson's work, it may take some time for that to happen. The HP output of 50+is my
best guest based on the blueprints. The power output is limited on overall scale and
magnets power level it calls for 18B... today I can get neo 48+B maybe 55s. The stator magnets
are 1"by3/8"by7" I believe that there are 17 stator magnets, there
are 6 part ark magnets. The part ark magnets look nothing like anything
I have seen on the web.
I believe that when most people order magnets for a HJ motor that they
get his rail type. I have taken a long time to come to this point with a self
education effort in understanding this motor. I learn by doing ,doing, and again. In my
mine I can see a picture of how the flux moves as a motor would run. It is a flux
switch system, using a magnet superconducting conduit. I would like to know what
Stephen Walker did with the shield, and scale the motor up and down.
In 1973 I made my first magnet motor. But could not make any thing work. So I
felt that I did not know all I needed to know about magnets. So I studied magnet, played with
magnet, and keep-ed notes. I used a old TV with a blue screen. When I placed the
magnets on to the TV picture tube, I could for the first time see the magnet fields.
The blue was, no field the red was north (neg) and yellow was south (pos). I found out that
when I made the magnets repelled, the magnet field would go away from the screen.
And a poles magnet field did not rotate with the magnet, but stayed fixed in space as
the magnet was rotated. But the pole only movement was from pole over pole.
And when I attract the magnets the field would combine, and be stronger.
So when I was fourteen years old I wrote." That
the poles are weaker when repelling, and stronger when attracting, and that this would
be like making the magnets go on and off like an electric motor." So years later, when
I first saw the plans of the HJ magnet motor about 1987 it hit me hard, that it was
real.
I understood what I must do, and this Email is part of that hope. In
Johnson's papers he talked about a verse in the Bible where the secrets of the
snow were being reserved for the days of trouble .The days of trouble are here,
this part of doing is a fulfillment, and will happen. So there is no one that can stop it.
Douglas A Mann
Reply to Doug
From: Sterling
D. Allan
To: Douglas Mann
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: About HJ Motor Blueprints
Douglass,
I would recommend putting them in both formats on CD so as to be
readable by the most number of people.
I've not seen an HJ motor running, but I have seen video footage of a
related magnetic motor in operation.
I'm going to forward your email to Richard. The two of you ought
to collaborate.
[...]
Sterling D. Allan
Second Letter from Doug
Sterling D. Allan,
Ok , I will put the blueprints in more than one universal
system on CD, ASAP.
I would like to see a running list file of new properties, or understandings posted. I
do not understand how to setup this kind of file system. Maybe a property was observed by some
one, smites If cool posted as a new property on its a new properties page. Then other
people could test them out, so we all will learn. This should be a group only file.
One thing that I like would like for others to look at is the simple
electric system.
With just a battery, two wires, and a resistance. The text books say that all of the
energy is dissipates in to heat as it mover the electrons through the resistance. So
all of the energy is conserved as heat. If the resistance were a coil of wire this is still
true. And if I use the by product of the moving current , the magnetic field, will not change
the heat dissipation of the energy through the resistance. So if the text books are right then
it looks to me that the number of electrons are all ways the same in the wires. See if any
of the energy from the battery was diverted to do something else, then the number of electrons
would fall off as the energy was changed into work out side the system and so a 100% eff
system would have no electrons coming back to the battery.( Tesla's one wire system)
So look at the CFR as a simple electric system, and the first
order of unity is the heat of dissipation; the next is the use of the magnetic field to produce
heat. If the people that are working on these types systems should look, and see that the
energy has always been; there is no need to have fusion to have over-unity, and that all
systems are over-unity.
The US Navy made a superconductor electric motor in 1998 as
a test. The motor produced about 100 hp at room temp was over 80% eff. But at -320C the motor
produced over 340hp with less power input. We should use the FOIA to get this test
information. See I believe that at low temp that no electrons are moving in the wires just
the potential current, like in magnets, no mass moving ,no dissipation of energy ,no
heat. The magnetic field is a product of the potential current, and does not have
anything to do with electrons moving. But it is true that if electrons are moving there is a
potential current, so a magnetic field also. See its not that the resistance drops
with temp, but its that there are less and less electrons to move through the same resistance so
the drift speed go up.
The so call law of conservation of energy was never tested on electric systems until the
CFR was done. The people just believed it was true, and can not believe its not after this
test, so they need fusion to cope. The CFR systems offer high temp heat of over-unity, and at
2.78COP it could run the new type Stirling engine generator, and self run. My CFR is a
Mercury vapor light in a therm of oil 2.41COP. All electric motors that are made have cooling
systems that must cool equal to the electric line input of energy. Let some one test a factory
made 90% eff motor and the fact that 100%+ of the electric is lost as heat plus the work output
of the magnetic field, so a 90% eff motor has a OU of 1.9+COP.
I hope that what I write is to the
point, to me it is all about a power full self running motor even if that were an Mercury
vapor light inside of a piston engine.
Douglas Allen Mann
Third Letter from Doug
Hi,
Here is part of the HJ motor blueprints. I believe that this came from H Johnson's work in
the 1970 to1972 or so. Have you seen this magnet shape before? Johnson's first rotary
motor used permanent magnets out of a special DOD electric motor. The maker of
the electric motor has destroyed the form that made the magnets after the DOD it
did not need them. This information came from a person I know that was trying to
reproduce Johnson's work in 1973 time frame. He tried to buy the die from the maker. There
is a lot more that I will get to in time, but there is a lot more information that time
has already got .The magnets for a rotary motor are not like the magnets for
the rail. If you look at the End View , you can see that the tips of the ark magnets
are flat with the bar magnets. So rail magnets will not work right on the rotary, also if
the edge of the ark magnets are to sharp they can not hold a stable pole location. Most
producers of magnets will take short cuts to make money or to lower price to get the
sale. I have an Idea for a mass production Ark Magnet System producing 24B field
magnets that are with in less than 1/2% of each others field balance. Les
Adam of AZ magnets inc died this week. A leader in the promotion of free
energy, founder of The Meeting of the Mines.
I will send the complete set soon.
Douglas
Mann
Drawings* * * * * * * * * * Another Letter from Doug
From: Douglas Mann
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: permission Re: About HJ Motor Blueprints
Sterling,
There are many blueprints out there most are not right (disinformation) . I have seen seven
blueprint sets, for a motor like the plans that I sent you. And only two of them were perfect
to H Johnson's style. I believe that this is H Johnson's work. Most of the bad plans have a round
sharped edge ark magnets that I believe were used in H Johnson's rail motor not the Rotory motor.
This places the pole face to a right angle to the rotor not at an snowflake's 60 deg angle Ha?
Some had stator magnets that had a 2 by 1 profile Johnson used a 3 by 8 ratio on most of
the snowflake stuff. By the way both H Johnson and Tom Bearden were DOE , or and DOD
retired. H Johnson magnet motor from 1970 then Tom Bearden's MEG unit 1996, and H Johnson and
Bearden are friends. H Johnson perfected the ABS braking systems ???
Later
Douglas Mann
Letter from Doug
From: Douglas Mann
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Suggestion for posting Howard Plans
Sterling,
I have a scanner, and have been working on this type of copy. That is how I
sent you the copy so far. I will send a messy copy. I will also go, and master copy
the blueprints, and we will see who screams after they are www posted.
I will scan the blueprints and let you work up a post-able form. I would like to include the complete H Johnson patent, and post the blueprints under the Patent number, that it is completely based on in the PD. Could we post the complete H Johnson Permanent Magnet Motor book?!!!! Back ground information.
I would like to see if there is any one that would like to help with the cost
of a full scale perfect prototype test motor project .We would first get prices,
and then set a breakdown like a share in the unit. Then after the project is over a
drawing could see who would get the motor. I believe that $6000 should get
all the stuff that would be needed. If we had 100 shares in the unit then it would cost
$60 per share. There would be a need for a project team then we can pull out all the stops. Each
person would get all of the information, and see the work progress, and testing live an the net.
This should be made open sourced.
Douglas Mann
More Coming; Plans for Posting, Implementing
From: <Douglas@mchsi.com>
To: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: Tom's Bearden's Paramagnet Magnet Motors
[...] Did you find the Theoretical Analysis as powerful, fact, and real? [...] At the time we get all the information out. I would like to push a Group program to make a motor on line. I will send the blueprints next, it will take some work. [...] I have worked with this information since about 1987, and have made the linear motor from figure 13 it has a scale. Then I made the ark from a ratio of scale to the patents figs 5,6,7,8. We could make a blueprint of a linear motor that would cost little, and a lot of people would do it. I believe that some one could scan the patent fig 7 and use paper fig 13 scale load it into AUTO-CAD make a blueprint fast. I first used steel for the shield, then non magnetized magnets, and last Co-Netic AA as a shield it is like night, and day. But the other stuff did show that it works. I do have more papers after I send the blueprints I will work them up for you. Doug See also
Page created by Sterling D. Allan
July 9, 2003 |
|
|