 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Johnson had working model before associate composed mathematical modelResponding to
Reply:
From: Douglas
Mann
To: Sterling
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 7:30 AM
Subject: About Equations for Johnson's motor
Sterling,
The differential equations in the paper are an
analysis of the force, or flux differences from point to point in a ideal model motor. This type
of information is not for most people to try to understand. H Johnson did not know or understand
his motor in this way either.
Math comes after, not before an invention. PHD type people try, for
the most part, to hide in a smoke screen of math, and big words; this makes themselves feel
superior. Some times true math may lead to a new relationships of an invention, that may
have never been tried. But before even then that new idea must be tested, with an new
invention.
I believe that the most useful information shown in this
papers are first the figs then that this is Johnson's work. To let the Equations
speak for themselves let us take a look at JL Naudin's work. http://juaudin.free.fr/html/johnmot.htm
Compare--- Here a computer takes the equations, and makes something that we can see, and use.
But the use of computer simulation analysis is not all that. The ideal
model is shown not a real world motor. Here is proof that it can work, but in is not where
anybody can over come the real world problems.
Douglas
See also
Page posted by SDA, July 20, 2003 |
|
|
